Showing posts with label hume. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hume. Show all posts

David Hume books on 4shared

img390/5735/davidhumexm6.jpg

David Hume (7 May 1711 [26 April O.S.] – 25 August 1776) was a Scottish philosopher and historian, regarded as one of the most important figures in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. Hume is often grouped with John Locke, George Berkeley, and a handful of others as a British Empiricist.

Some references:

Read more...

Laurent Jaffro:Science de la nature humaine ou science de l'esprit humain?

Il s'agit d'abord de réexaminer les termes dans lesquels les principaux auteurs des Lumières écossaises ont pensé ce qui n'était pas pour eux les sciences humaines ou sociales, mais « la science de l'homme », ou plus précisément la « science de la nature humaine » – c'est l'expression qui a la faveur de Hume –, ou encore la « science de l'esprit humain » ou la « philosophie de l'esprit humain » – c'est la formule privilégiée par Dugald Stewart et qui a fini, chez les Écossais et leurs disciples français, par désigner la psychologie écossaise dans son ensemble, à l'exclusion de Hume. Ensuite, je signale les différences significatives entre Hume et Reid, sur un fond qui, certes, leur est commun, et je montre la postérité de cette dualité dans la psychologie philosophique en France au dix-neuvième siècle.
Laurent Jaffro - Science de la nature humaine ou science de l'esprit humain ? Le débat écossais et son impact sur la psychologie philosophique en France

Read more...

David Hume free ebooks

from Guttenberg

Read more...

Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger (online editions)

link: cairn

Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger P.U.F. I.S.S.N. : papier 0035-3833 en ligne en cours 4 nos /an Site de la revue


--

2008/1 - Tome 133 - n° 1

Pascal, Machiavel, Hume, Freud

2007/4 - Tome 132 - n° 4

Philosophie des sciences : Auguste Comte

2007/3 - Tome 132 - n° 3

Geneviève Rodis-Lewis interprète de Descartes

2007/2 - Tome 132 - n° 2

Platon, Kant, Scheler

2007/1 - Tome 132 - n° 1

Hegel : la vie

2006/4 - Tome 131 - n° 4

Nietzsche

2006/3 - Tome 131 - n° 3

Gilbert Simondon

2006/2 - Tome 131 - n° 2

Vérités éternelles, forme de la langue, esthétique architecturales

2006/1 - Tome 131 - n° 1

Whitehead

2005/4 - Tome 130 - n° 4

La traduction philosophique

2005/3 - Tome 130 - n° 3

Ribot, Lévy-Bruhl, Durkheim

2005/2 - Tome 130 - n° 2

L'altérité

2005/1 - Tome 130 - n° 1

Écriture et persécution

2004/4 - Tome 129 - n° 4

La traduction philosophique

2004/3 - Tome 129 - n° 3

Philosophie du vivant

2004/2 - Tome 129 - n° 2

Tourner la phénoménologie

2004/1 - Tome 129 - n° 1

Marcel Conche

2003/4 - Tome 128 - n° 4

Le sublime et le terrible

2003/3 - Tome 128 - n° 3

Christian Wolff

2003/2 - Tome 128 - n° 2

Fénelon

2003/1 - Tome 128 - n° 1

Francis Bacon et l'invention

2002/4 - Tome 127 - n° 4

Autour de Heidegger

2002/3 - Tome 127 - n° 3

Philosopher en France (1940-1944)

2002/2 - Tome 127 - n° 2

Le temps dans l'Antiquité

2002/1 - Tome 127 - n° 1

Pascal

Religion, philosophie, psychanalyse
2001/4 - Tome 126 - n° 4

Psychanalyse, philosophie, religion

2001/3 - Tome 126 - n° 3

Michel Henry

Prochainement disponible
2001/2 - Tome 126 - n° 2

Hume

2001/1 - Tome 126 - n°1

Rationalité et automatisme


Read more...

Stanford Encyclopedia: Kant and Hume on Morality

The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) is often contrasted with that of David Hume (1711–1776). Hume's method of moral philosophy is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the necessity of grounding morality in a priori principles. Hume says that reason is properly a “slave to the passions,” while Kant bases morality in his conception of a reason that is practical in itself. Hume identifies such feelings as benevolence and generosity as proper moral motivations; Kant sees the motive of duty—a motive that Hume usually views as a second best or fall back motive—as uniquely expressing an agent's commitment to morality and thus as conveying a special moral worth to actions. Although there are many points at which Kant's and Hume's ethics stand in opposition to each other, there are also important connections between the two. Kant shared some important assumptions about morality and motivation with Hume, and had, early in his career, been attracted and influenced by the sentimentalism of Hume and other British moralists.

My aim in this essay is not to compare Hume and Kant on all matters ethical. Instead, I intend to examine several key areas of ethics in which we can reasonably see Kant as responding to or influenced by Hume, or in which comparisons between their theories are particularly interesting. I will have more to say about Kant than Hume. I will include exposition of many of each philosopher's important arguments so that the reader can make comparisons herself.

Hume's main ethical writings are to be found in A Treatise on Human Nature (1739–40), especially books two and three, and in An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751). Also relevant to Hume's ethics are various essays, such as “Of Suicide” (1777), parts of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), and his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779).

Kant's main works on ethics, narrowly considered, are the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), and the Metaphysics of Morals (1797), which contains both “the Doctrine of Right” and “the Doctrine of Virtue.” Other works of importance to Kant's moral philosophy include the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (1793), and Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798), in addition to student notes on lectures Kant gave on ethics and various essays on history and political philosophy, such as “Conjectures on the Beginning of Human History” (1786) and “Toward Perpetual Peace” (1795).

[complete text]

Read more...

Lorem Ipsum

"All testing, all confirmation and disconfirmation of a hypothesis takes place already within a system. And this system is not a more or less arbitrary and doubtful point of departure for all our arguments; no it belongs to the essence of what we call an argument. The system is not so much the point of departure, as the element in which our arguments have their life."
- Wittgenstein

Lorem Ipsum

"Le poète ne retient pas ce qu’il découvre ; l’ayant transcrit, le perd bientôt. En cela réside sa nouveauté, son infini et son péril"

René Char, La Bibliothèque est en feu (1956)


  © Blogger template Shush by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP