George K York and David A Steinberg: The Philosophy of Hughlings Jackson

The work of John Hughlings Jackson (1835-1911) has attracted considerable attention among historians and philosophers of science because it set a conceptual framework for scientific neurology. In this paper we examine the notion, espoused by some modern writers, that his scientific work was motivated by a deep interest in metaphysics. There are two elements in the story—a youthful crisis of intention, and an alleged mature interest in formal metaphysical speculation. We use the term metaphysics to describe the extrapolation of a scientific theory beyond the phenomena it is intended to explain1. For example, Herbert Spencer's extension of evolutionary principles beyond biology into all manner of social and political realms is a form of metaphysical speculation. On this view of metaphysics, we argue, Hughlings Jackson's personal intentions were not at all metaphysical. [entyre text]

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Lorem Ipsum

"All testing, all confirmation and disconfirmation of a hypothesis takes place already within a system. And this system is not a more or less arbitrary and doubtful point of departure for all our arguments; no it belongs to the essence of what we call an argument. The system is not so much the point of departure, as the element in which our arguments have their life."
- Wittgenstein

Lorem Ipsum

"Le poète ne retient pas ce qu’il découvre ; l’ayant transcrit, le perd bientôt. En cela réside sa nouveauté, son infini et son péril"

René Char, La Bibliothèque est en feu (1956)


  © Blogger template Shush by Ourblogtemplates.com 2009

Back to TOP